Quicksearch
Your search for marijuana returned 177 results:
Monday, August 30. 2010
By Jon Katz, a Virginia and Maryland criminal defense lawyer and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Montgomery County, and beyond, pursuing the best possible results for clients. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com. 
Image from public domain. Through my excitement over the District of Columbia’s becoming an additional medical marijuana jurisdiction, I did not focus on the problem that other than the following “qualifying medical conditions” allowing use of medical marijuana, any other qualifying condition must be approved by a rulemaking of the District of Columbia government for a condition that is: (i) Chronic or long-lasting; (ii) Debilitating or interferes with the basic functions of life; and (iii) A serious medical condition for which the use of medical marijuana is beneficial: (I) That cannot be effectively treated by any ordinary medical or surgical measure; or (II) For which there is scientific evidence that the use of medical marijuana is likely to be significantly less addictive than the ordinary medical treatment for that condition.
The already qualifying medical conditions allowing use of medical marijuana are: (A) Human immunodeficiency virus; (B) Acquired immune deficiency syndrome; (C) Glaucoma; (D) Conditions characterized by severe and persistent muscle spasms, such as multiple sclerosis; (E) Cancer.
Consequently, particularly if you are a District of Columbia resident, please contact the D.C. government during the 45-day notice-and-comment period that started August 6, 2010, to urge an expansion of the statutorily-listed conditions that permit medical marijuana use, because the initial draft medical marijuana regulations initial draft medical marijuana regulations do not add any conditions to the above list of five that are permitted for medical marijuana use. For your convenience, here is a petition from Safe Access D.C. that you may sign and submit online to comment. I also suggest submitting your own personalized comments to Mayor Fenty or other council leaders on the draft rulemaking. The proposed rulemaking directs that comments may be made as follows:
Comments on this rule should be submitted, in writing, to Arthur J. Parker, Chief, Rulemaking Section, Office of the Attorney General, Legal Counsel Division, 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 409, Washington, DC, 20004, within forty-five (45) days of the date of publication of this notice in the D.C. Register.
Friday, August 27. 2010
By Jon Katz, a Virginia and Maryland criminal defense lawyer and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Montgomery County, and beyond, pursuing the best possible results for clients. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com. 
Image from public domain. Check out the North Carolina house made from hemp. Thanks to the late Jack Herer's page for featuring a video of the house and its owners.
Thursday, August 26. 2010
By Jon Katz, a Virginia and Maryland criminal defense lawyer and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Montgomery County, and beyond, pursuing the best possible results for clients. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com.
As I understand it, high schoolers, if not also college students, are widely seen as in nowheresville if they do not have FaceBook accounts. What happened to people’s cynicism about overcommercialism and overconformity, including the inundation of advertisements on the righthand side of the FaceBook page that is specifically tailored to the userid and password that you insert? FaceBook repeatedly gets criticized for its many obstacles to privacy. Now comes a new reason to rail against Facebook, after it revealed that Facebook will not allow advertisements with marijuana leaf pictures, even when the advertisement presents the leaf image to support marijuana legalization. Who wants to heavily patronize Facebook when it imposes such bans? Firedoglake has a petition against this FaceBook ban here . The JustSayNow campaign has devised a logo for everyone’s use with a “censored” stamp over a marijuana leaf. Despite Google’s history of cozying up to the Chinese government's censorships and repression machine, at least it has agreed to run the marijuana leaf ad banned by Facebook. If nobody else has come up with the idea, if people are not going to abandon Facebook wholesale, it will be a great idea to have a Facebook-free day when nobody logs onto Facebook. That will heavily displease Facebook’s advertisers, which may be the only people that Facebook ends up truly listening to.
Tuesday, August 24. 2010

Image from public domain. By Jon Katz, a Virginia and Maryland criminal defense lawyer and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Montgomery County, and beyond, pursuing the best possible results for clients. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com. Marijuana is beneficial medicine from nature rather than from synthetics. Sadly, Nevada Judge Dave Gamble ordered a California man convicted of selling marijuana to write a report about "the nonsensical character" of California's medical mrijuana laws, with the judge's calling marijuana a gateway drug, which it is not. Thanks to the ABA Journal for posting on this story.
Thursday, August 5. 2010
By Jon Katz, a criminal defense and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland and beyond. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com. Since when is society better off with alcohol use and synthetic prescription drug use replacing marijuana use as a result of marijuana prohibition? Thanks to graphic artist Haik Hoisington for driving home the excessive social costs of banning marijuana with his video "The Flower."
Wednesday, July 28. 2010

Image from public domain. By Jon Katz, a criminal defense and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland and beyond. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com. When my clients lament being arrested for possessing their medicinal marijuana, I sometimes have pointed out the states where it is legal to smoke marijuana for medicinal use. Today is cause for celebration that the District of Columbia’s medical marijuana law yesterday cleared the final Congressional colonial hurdle. Legally dispensed medical marijuana should become available in early 2011 in the District of Columbia. I imagine that medical marijuana users from neighboring Maryland and Virginia will also wish to take advantage of the D.C. law, even if that means moving to D.C., and boosting the city’s real estate values. The week gets better with the news that state-authorized medical marijuana will be permitted to be smoked by patients staying at Veterans hospitals.
Monday, July 26. 2010
By Jon Katz, a criminal defense and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland and beyond. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com. Although drug possession consists of knowledge, dominion and control over the drugs, that does not automatically prevent a person from being arrested, prosecuted and convicted for being in the knowing presence of drugs without having any other involvement with them. Last Friday, Maryland’s highest court, with two dissenters, proclaimed: “Considering his proximity to the blunt, the fact that it was visible to him from his seat at the table, and the overwhelming smell of the marijuana smoke, a rational fact-finder could infer reasonably that he was engaging in the mutual use and enjoyment of the marijuana, and exercised dominion and control over the marijuana.” Smith v. Maryland, __ Md. _ (July 23, 2010). Smith likens the scenario of the execution of the search warrant in the case to a Cheech and Chong movie. However, the affirmance of Smith’s conviction is a sad state of affairs rather than any bellylaugh that results from the best of Cheech and Chong. In Smith, the dissenters got it right, not the majority.
Tuesday, July 20. 2010

Too many people are unjustly caged in United States prisons. (Image from Bureau of Prisons' website). By Jon Katz, a criminal defense and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland and beyond. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com. Before today, the only lengthy discussion I remember having with a prison warden or jail head during my many years of visiting many such places, was to get information to assist my client in a prison disciplinary matter. Yesterday, while waiting for quite some time in the visiting room to speak with an imprisoned client for his pending court hearing, (imprisoned before I ever got in the picture), a man in a suit comes in and checks on the HVAC unit, and tells me that it’s not providing enough cooling. I reply that I am not concerned for my air-conditioned comfort there, as I am only there for a short time, but that I am concerned for the inmates’ comfort in the highly humid heat. He tells me that inmates do not get airconditioning, but fans instead, which raises for me the image of numerous black-and-white film scenes, none of them uplifting. This man turned out to be the prison’s warden. He was lowkey enough that he did not even mention that along with his name until I asked him. He was in a talkative mood, which I thought was interesting given the many duties he likely had for the rest of the day. On the other hand, at some point, one’s family and friends might get tired of hearing about the work of a warden and other jobs, and people might then seek out others to discuss such issues; or maybe he had a message to get out to me or through me. He had a few ideas that seemed heartfelt, and I share them briefly here: - As to air conditioning, he grew up in East Baltimore, where so many people to this day sit on their home stoops in the summer, not having air conditioning inside. - Many people do not want inmates returning to their communities, which he seemed to think did not make sense. I think that is be expected, but it is not a realistic goal. Inmates ultimately will serve their sentence, and return to one community or another eventually, unless they are imprisoned on life sentences and never paroled. - Even with rehabilitation in prison, the benefits of such rehabilitation are offset for inmates who return to homes where their parents are shooting up drugs (or he may have said smoking crack, but I think he said shooting drugs). - He talked about the problems of recidivism when the environment that an inmate is released to is not hospitable to not committing more crime. He thinks the nearby bootcamp program (former program, I think) was beneficial to reducing recidivism. - The community environment affects whether people get caught in the criminal prosecution system. He mentioned the disadvantage that people have in this regard when they get off the schoolbus into a “warzone” of such places as the corner of Guilford and North Avenue in Baltimore. I take it he is talking about a corner with rampant illegal drug buys and sells. - He talked about people who have the ability to pay for their education and those who do not. He talked about people on unemployment who do not want to work while receiving unemployment checks; he may have talked about the aversion of some unemployed people to do work that pays less than their former work. - During his many years in the prison system, he has gotten the knowledge equivalent of a law degree without a law degree. - He compared Newt Gingrich’s message of self-reliance to Barack Obama’s (I think he reference Obama) message of government helping out. He said that both of them are right in some respects. I think he meant that self reliance is important, but he also feels that the support one gets in his or her community affects - He has been working with the prison system for thirty years, and now is forty-nine. He got locked up once himself in his youth. I told him about my plan for achieving a higher-quality, more just, and less expensive criminal justice system, which is to legalize marijuana, heavily decriminalize all other drugs, eliminate mandatory minimum sentencing, eliminate the death penalty, and eliminate per se guilty rules in DWI cases. I think he then started talking about the many people who want people incarcerated over drugs and other crimes rather than doing non-incarcerated treatment for drugs. I could have engaged the warden in more conversation, including why he chose to work in the prison system in the first place, and why he stayed (how much does it go beyond earning an income?); the ongoing dynamics in such lower income neighborhoods as those found in East Baltimore; how humane or not are the prisons he has worked in; and how he feels about working in the prison system, including when considering all the innocent people who get wrongfully convicted by juries and judges, or who convict themselves through guilty pleas even if innocent, in order to avoid a worse outcome through a trial. However, as I awaited my client, I wanted to get more work done. I have often wondered how much difference there is to be a full-time inmate versus an employer at a prison or jail. I know that the prison and jail employee gets to leave after his or her workshift, and that the employee can always quit the job and thereby not need to return to jail nor prison. However, during the eight hours or longer that a prison or jail employee is on the job, I would imagine that being there feels pretty confining. I have often felt that even when in jails and prisons for less than three or four hours. This prison warden seems to still have his humanity with him, which hopefully will benefit his prison’s inmates and which will hopefully encourage others working in the prison system and criminal justice system. He seems to care about helping people avoid the circumstances that cause them to get locked up and to recidivate in the first place. I give him credit for taking the time to talk with me.
Wednesday, July 7. 2010
I often hear people, including criminal defense colleagues, rallying around candidates for judges and chief prosecutors. Rarely do I hear talk in such promotions, and during confirmation hearings, about the extent to which the judge will be overly harsh with setting bonds and setting sentences. Criminal defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. However, too many presumed-innocent defendants are caged pretrial, due to laws presuming no bail pretrial, judges simply giving no bond, or both. I even had a client whose bond was revoked on his then-pending drunk driving case merely because he was arrested a few weeks later for the same charge, even though he was still presumed innocent and even though I strenuously objected particularly to there having been an absence of any live witnesses at the bond revocation hearing and an absence of much facts even to support probable cause for the new arrest. Some may feel that sentences no higher than the maximum allowed are in line with the oversimplified claim that "If you do the crime, you do the time." However, we already know from the many people exonerated from death row that many people are wrongfully convicted of doing the crime. I think most people also would agree that a person caught with one marijuana cigarette in his pocket, with no prior criminal record, should not be slammed with a one-year sentence. A recent Washington Post article underlines how harsh some sentences can get. Although I do not know enough about the facts surrounding the sentence nor whether the defendant had prior criminal convictions, the Post article talks about a man sentenced to two years in prison for training a laser light on a police helicopter searching for a robbery suspect. His lawyer asserted that the act had been immature and possibly related to alcohol. Before starting my criminal defense practice, I was more obsessed with free expression protection and death penalty abolition than on rampant shredding of other rights in the criminal courts. Shortly after starting criminal defense work, my obsession with criminal defense rights took at least the same urgency as my obsession with free expression rights and abolishing the death penalty. By Jon Katz, a criminal defense and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland and beyond. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com.
Tuesday, June 22. 2010
Last September, I blogged about efforts in the United States House of Representatives to eliminate bars to federal financial aid for simple drug possession convictions. My recent check on Congress’s Thomas website http://thomas.loc.gov showed that the measure passed the House of Representatives and was referred to a Senate Committee, but the information stopped there, so I assumed the measure died or went into suspended animation, unless it got incorporated into a different bill. Google searches and visits to the websites of Students for Sensible Drug Policy, the Drug Policy Alliance, and NORML did not reveal whether or not the measure has become law (and nor do those organizations have an obligation to post the information, but I post it here as a result of not finding the answer elsewhere).
This is a question that is important to many of my clients, so I double-checked with the NORML lawyers’ email listserv to verify whether this measure had not become law yet. Thanks to the two listserve members who replied yes, that drug possession has not yet been removed from the bars to federal financial aid, even though that is not the answer I wanted to hear.
Thanks to the listserv member who also pointed out the following: Drug paraphernalia convictions do not bar federal financial aid, nor do such case dispositions as suspended imposition of sentence that result in no conviction; those alternative dispositions are a negotiation tool available when representing students charged with drug possession or distribution who are federal financial aid recipients. The listserv member also pointed out that a drug manufacturing conviction will not bar federal financial aid, which certainly sounds like an unintended loophole, in part when considering that manufacturing requires possession. However, the direct and collateral consequences of a manufacturing conviction likely are much worse than those for getting a fine for possessing marijuana, even where a possession conviction means a loss of federal financial aid.
By Jon Katz, a criminal defense and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland and beyond. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com.
Friday, June 11. 2010
Chihuahua Channel 44's coverage of violence in Juarez. Sixteen years ago, when in the El Paso area, I visited with a friend who lives in Juaraz, Mexico. I found a garage on the El Paso side to park my car, because my rental car agreement did not cover driving in Mexico.
I walked across the border over the short footbridge, and had an enjoyable and violence-free several hours with my friend, including having vegetarian food at a top-shelf restaurant, briefly accompanying him the next morning in his daily work life, and, on my own, strolling the streets and shops close to the border crossing before my return.
My return to the United States the next morning over the footbridge was quick and uneventful past the border checkpoint, other than a surprised question from the Customs agent about how my bottle of water could have been the only thing I had purchased during my less than a day in Mexico.
Times have changed dramatically in Juaraz since then. Juarez is among the several areas of Mexico –- but certainly not the only one –- that has been transformed into a constant gun battle ground, catching innocent victims in the shooting violence and kidnappings.
I had a chance recently to catch up with my friend from Juarez, who was visiting the Washington, D.C., area. I will keep his identity confidential due to his remaining in Juarez with the city’s ongoing violence, even though he did not tell m anything that is not alreay news on the street. My friend, a member of the business establishment, has the financial and personal wherewithal to relocate to a less violent part of Mexico. He has made the decision to stay in Juarez, where his family, business, and many friends remain. This has been his home for years, and he wishes to continue with as normal a life as he can there.
His daily life does not seem to have changed too much, other than to make some concerted efforts to avoid getting caught in violence, including driving a longer but safer route to get to his office from home. His crossing time into the United States has not been slowed down much, but this is at the expense of obtaining a passage card to enter the U.S. that requires an extensive background check. I have only been to two places in Mexico, which are Juarez in 1994 and Tijuana in 1977. Both have gotten overridden by drug-related violence, with Tijuana worse off in this transition. My friend emphasized that there are other parts of Mexico that are further from the U.S. border that also are caught up heavily in drug violence, but that get less attention in the United States by being farther from the United States.
How can all this drug-running violence be reversed –- not just in Mexico but worldwide? The violence would not exist without the huge demand for illegal drugs. Fewer people would be demanding drugs –- both of the legal and illegal varieties -– if they did not feel in so much psychological, spiritual, and physical pain, distress, and disconnect.
Decades of experience has shown that drug prohibition and harsh drug sentences does not stop a huge demand for illegal drugs. What would happen if all nations legalized drugs? That would open up drugs to being produced legally domestically and imported legally. That would reverse the drug violence, so much so that illegal drug dealers and illegal drug manufacturers probably want their product kept illegal in order to avoid more widespread competition and reduced prices that result from making a product legal with more competition.
Many decry the concept of legalizing drugs, for fear of the social ills of purchasing harmful drugs over the counter. Another available approach is to make most currently-illegal drugs available in a more regulated way. I am interested in learning more specific ideas for that approach; we already have seen the medical marijuana model in California and elsewhere that requires a doctor’s written recommendation before it may be obtained. On the more chilling side, still seared into my memory is the image of my taking the wrong pedestrian turn to the heart of Vancouver’s Chinatown in 2001, and cringing at a crazed-looking man stabbing heroin into his palm at an open-air shooting gallery, which I figure was either regulated for distributing needles, or somehow else tolerated by police for shooting up.
Drug legalization would cause a slew of people in the criminal justice system –- including judges, prosecutors, criminal defense lawyers, law enforcement, probation and parole officers, and jailers -- to go looking for work elsewhere, or to look for other types of customers. That is fine by me, and I certainly hope that nobody earning a living in the criminal justice system is resisting drug reform due to their own salary concerns. I’ll drink to that.
By Jon Katz, a criminal defense and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland and beyond. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com.
Wednesday, June 2. 2010

Image from public domain. Thanks to a listserv member for providing this June 1, 2010, Washington Post link about an assertion that marijuana send signals to a nerve cell and back out again: Five years ago, while still a regular physician, [William] Courtney[, M.D.,] was as spooked as most doctors about pot. Then he came across an article in the December 2004 issue of Scientific American. It changed his life. The article highlighted a molecule in cannabis that could do something he had never seen before: send signals not only into a nerve cell, but also back out again. The finding reversed 20 years of his understanding of how neurotransmitters work. One-way traffic was the basis for inflammation: Immune cells receive endless messages to get cracking, none to calm down. Continuous attacking can inflame otherwise healthy tissue. Two-way communication makes possible a feedback loop, encouraging a modulation, the promise of which swept over the Michigan-born microbiology major with the force of religion. "My God," he said. "It's the basis of health." Courtney keeps a framed graphic from the article on his desk. It stands beside copies of "Non-psychotropic plant cannabinoids: new therapeutic opportunities from an ancient herb," from Trends in Pharmacological Sciences... Dr. Courtney has more medical marijuana links here. Jon Katz - Criminal defense and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland and beyond. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com.
Wednesday, May 26. 2010

Image from public domain. When Internet site filters are a client's only option to use the Internet while on pretrial supervision or on probation, I ask courts for the filtering option, if my client is willing. A recent vacation hotel brought me to the hotel's desktop computer, where I learned that its SiteCoach filtering system blocks my entire blog and some pages of my website. The automated reason given for blocking the blog is its discussion of marijuana. The reason given for blocking some of my static website's pages was marijuana for some pages, and adult entertainment for such pages as my overview page, which discusses First Amendment protection for adult entertainment. If Internet filter software has various levels of intensity, perhaps my hotel's was set too high. I messaged SiteCoach back about why they were mistaken to have filtered by site, but maybe it would have been wiser not to have contacted them unless I was also going to tell them how much I oppose filters in the first place, not that my opposition would affect the very raison d'etre of their company. A further search on the hotel's desktop computer found blockage of the following websites that also include coverage of marijuana public policy: NORML's website, the Marijuana Policy Project, the Drug Policy Alliance, and Drug War Rant. The blockage perhaps is skewed against websites advocating for drug legalization and decriminalization, because the U.S. drug czar's blog is not blocked. The SiteCoach filtering software also blocked Playboy but not FHM. At the very least, SiteCoach did not block the Wikipedia pages for such topics as marijuana and the Fund for the Unrestricted Creation of Knowledge (also known as F*CK). I urge people to forego the use of Internet censoring filters. If you are going to use them nonetheless (e.g., because young children are in your household), I suggest at the very least that you not purchase filtering software that will not permit you to override the software for websites you do not think should be filtered in the first place. Jon Katz - Criminal defense and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland and beyond. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com.
Wednesday, May 19. 2010
DEA image in the public domain.
Thanks to the Marijuana Policy Project for distributing free copies online of John Kelly's "False Positives Equal False Justice".
The report asserts that: "This two-year scientific/legal investigation reveals a drug testing regime of fraudulent forensics used by police, prosecutors, and judges which abrogates every American’s Constitutional rights. The report is a call to action by former FBI chief scientist and narcotics officer, Dr. Frederic Whitehurst and writer and forensic drug expert, John Kelly, for lawmakers to enact a moratorium on the use of these tests and to create the necessary oversight and control of drug testing to protect the public’s basic freedoms. While the report does not examine blood or urine drug tests, it does examine in depth lab tests as well as field tests used by police, jails, schools, border guards, parents and others to determine if a suspected substance is in fact an illegal drug."
Thanks to local lawyer Paul McGlone, whose website alerted me to "False Positives Equal False Justice". Jon Katz - Criminal defense and DWI defense lawyer practicing in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland and beyond. 301-495-7755. http://katzjustice.com.
Friday, May 14. 2010

Image from public domain. Last week, I blogged about the D.C. City Council's final passage of a medical marijuana law, for Mayor Fenty's expected signature. Not having found the final law's text on Google, I obtained it from the D.C. City Council website, which is not the easiest to navigate. The text is here.
|